Thursday 17 November 2011

Economics

I’m sorry to say that for this blog I shall be opening with a quote from the musical Cabaret     “Money makes the world go around
It makes the world go 'round.
In Chris Horrie’s lecture the main theme was money and the economic system. Chris emphasised the idea, well his opinion, that to solve the economic crisis we simply need to print more money. Somehow, I think it’s a little more complicated than that. But one thing that Chris said that did make the world of sense is that money is possibly the most powerful thing in the universe, and in some aspects, it could possibly be more interesting than sex. That’s right, more interesting than SEX. Like Chris said “if you have a lot of money, you can have all the sex you want”.  And people wonder why people are so obsessed with money. If you look at it in this way, money can buy you anything.

Richardo
The process of getting money is initially relatively easy; it’s the work that you have to do to get money that’s the hard part. Every human has specific wants; some can be mistaken with needs. A human doesn’t need anything. The only argument you could make is if a human wants to avoid dying, but not every human has the aspiration to live and in that case, they genuinely don’t need anything. Economics ignores the “need”. Economics tests how much a person is willing to pay for things. Utility or utilitarianism is a word that links hand in hand with the economics of money. Utility is the fundamental, measureable phenomena of human wants. Every person, in a purchasing situation, automatically judges the way to maximise our utility.

Ricardo, an Economist, created the law of value. He believed that things are priced depending on the amount of labour it takes to make it. For example, a pen costs only £1 because it takes very little effort to make it whereas a piano costs over £1000 because it takes lots of hours and man power, with expensive materials used to make it. Another economist, Malthus, wrote the Iron Law of Population. He believed that the wants of people are more important, in that persons own mind, than that persons drive to repopulate. In this particular statement, Malthus is wrong because the human race have grasped the ability to stabilise the amount that they populate. China, for example, has derived the one child per family system in order to stop their population from rising too dramatically. But we have to give Malthus the benefit of the doubt; unfortunately he couldn’t predict the future and couldn’t foresee contraception and abortion being invented. These are main contributors to keeping the population from rising to ridiculous amounts.
Malthus

Today’s lecture also told me that the rates of wages go up and down dependant on the demand for that particular career field and how much profit that industry is currently making. The only problem with this form of working is that if a wage of a certain jobs goes down, people are therefore earning less, giving them less to spend and put back into the market. As a result, other businesses will suffer as they are unable to sell their produce. So clearly the wage system is a cruel thing to come under, it’s a shame that we all have to suffer at some stage. The only thing that can be learned from this is that to survive we need growth; nothing can come to a complete stand still. The economists that think in this order are known as Keynesian Economists.

The second type of Economists follows the works of Adam Smith, the mind that bought us The Wealth of Nations. These Economists are known as Monetarists. These people believe that people plan how the economy is shaped and make accurate assumptions about money. They believe that people instinctively calculate supply and demand. Chris went onto explain that when there is an economic crisis people just need to accept a decrease in wages but people become irrational when they are being deprived of the money they were once receiving. He continued to say that war is a good thing for the economy because it is a perfect way of getting rid of unemployment. £60billion is spent a year on the military, going to war is, therefore, a great way of boosting the amount of money going into the economy. Another great way of achieving this is increasing the amount of people working in systems like the NHS. Allowing more people to work in the health system benefits the people being employed, aiding them to gain some wages, and the people that need the NHS for their health problems because there are now more staff available to deal with their problems. When you look at it as being as simple as that, it makes you gain the outlook; that it’s better to have people doing small, menial jobs than it is to be unemployed.

Chris, at the end of lecture supplied us with an equation for how expenditure works, and with the equation I shall finish this post.
            Where ‘C’ is Household expenditure and ‘I’ is Private Investment and ‘G’ is Government Spending the equation looks something like this;
                                                      
Y = C + I + G

If ‘Y’ decreases there won’t be enough money in the economy to keep the population employed.

Tuesday 15 November 2011

Thursday 10 November 2011

MARX + NIETZSCHE + FREUD = THE THREE GREAT SKEPTICS

These three giant names written above are the three greats that were considered to have founded modern hermeneutics. In case you are wondering what on earth that big long word means, it is the word used when talking about the science of interpretation.

The first of the three greats I shall talk about is Nietzsche. Nietzsche, a philosopher from Germany, was a subjectivist. Subjectivists believed in the fundamental experience of something to believe it actually happened. For example (the best example given by none other than Chris Horrie);
·         INCIDENT : A tree has fallen
·         THE SUBJECTIVE: Well it can’t have fallen because I didn’t hear it.
·         THE OBJECTIVE: Well, ok, it would still make a noise and could have still fallen even if I didn’t hear it.


Nietzsche used this subjective system of looking at things by combining it with Epistemology to question theories made by philosophers of the enlightenment such as Kant. Epistemology focuses on the nature and scope of knowledge and Nietzsche believed that in life there was no universal truth, just impressions of truths which have a relative value. Unlike that of the Enlightenment where they believed things were discovered and justified through reason and science. Other than rejecting ideas from previous philosophers, Nietzsche suggested that nothing in life is certain and as humans, we are unsure whether we will see a specific object or person more than once in our lives.

Marx on the other hand was not a subjectivist. Marx focussed his studies on human social development or the differences in Hierarchy. He claimed to have discovered the universal law of human social development. That just shows how certain he was that his theory on this matter was correct. He was a firm believer in that the ideology of the oppressed is different to that of the oppressor. For example; the conservative party, actually, David Cameron, being the egotistical idiot that he is, believes that further education needs a higher price tag whereas the students, who initially voted for the liberal democrats, believe in the exact opposite because it costs us enough as it is.  Marx believed, which I completely agree with, is that humans have different values and truths dependent to their upbringing and the society around them. To those from a third world country, things that we seem very everyday day, normal things, would amuse and amaze them for possibly hours at a time, giving us the impression that they are still stuck in this very tribal state of mentality.

I am afraid, however that I am now at the point in my blog where I must talk about Freud and yet again I have to talk about his theory of the tri-conscious mind that we all have. He believed that mental unhappiness came from this tripartite mind and that mankind is on a slow decline to death. Oh Freud, another one of your happy-go-lucky theories for us. According to Freud, humans copy each other and follow each other like a pack of animals and are born and will die in a state of depression. Thanks Freud, for making my life seems so worth it. Freud’s theories were however criticised by other theorists. Hardly surprising, if I must say so myself. Nietzsche argued that each individual person has a will which allows them to do as they please rather than follow the crowd. If they choose to follow society it is because they are doing so according to their own mental or physical choice/will. The seven deadly sins play a big role in this theory of Freud’s, as people of the time were particularly religious, regardless of their religion status. The seven deadly sins are virtues and we should all just express ourselves freely and evil is just what we as individuals disapprove of.
 
Following the lecture we watched a short operetta named “The Seven Deadly Sins” composed by Kurt Weill and Bertolt Brecht in 1933. The operetta follows the story of Anna, a schizophrenia sufferer. Her split personality is her Anna 1 and Anna 2, her white sister who tries to be reason but often influences her to the wrong. As operetta states in its genre title, there is no spoken word, the story is told through song.  This operetta really captured how Freud’s tripartite self can work on an individual with the ego and the id and how they are in constant conflict with each other. 

Tuesday 8 November 2011

Birth of the Modern Mass Media

On the 29th September, our first lecture of the semester, we were introduced to Modernism and psychoanalysis. Modernism marked change. It was the time where people questioned answers; no answers were correct or incorrect. Things went back to a more scientific approach, like in the enlightenment, rather than looking at things in the passionate perspective of the Romantic Period.

Modernism in itself implied a “new era”, a new way of thinking. It wanted to get rid of traditions of the past and revolved around the findings of new art and literature. Modernism also brought us the big names of Freud and Nietzsche from the philosophy world and Wagner of the musical world. The lectures and the seminars in the next few weeks will be broadening my awareness of these great names.


Citizen Kane, the film screening for this lecture, is a film that notably showcases the characteristics of journalism. It can be argued that some aspects of Citizen Kane feature in modern day tabloid printing, eg. Rupert Murdoch. Unlike Kane, Murdoch didn’t write a list of principles for his newspaper to follow, he did however change the face of the modern day newspaper, what with the page three girls and the sordid stories that you find from page to page. But like Kane, he has/did have close relationships and friendships with some celebrity figures. And also like Kane, Murdoch will, if he already hasn’t, reached a not so pretty climax.


Tabloid Nation

Tabloid Nation by Chris Horrie
For the first seminar of the semester, the reading was Tabloid Nation by Chris Horrie (our lecturer). The first two chapters of this book focus on the development of thee tabloid newspapers in the 20th Century. With the rise of the big name newspapers like the Daily Mail and The Sun, smaller newspapers such as the Daily Mirror were always going to suffer. The two chapters from Tabloid Nation follow the particular history of The Daily Mirror.  

Alfred Harmsworth, the founder and owner of the Daily Mail newspaper. He was the richest and the most powerful man in British Journalism of the time. It’s no wonder that he soon became Lord Northcliffe. Harmsworth introduced a women’s section which became so popular amongst the readers.  Because of this great success it was decided that a newspaper designed especially for women, this is how the Daily Mirror was created. At the beginning of its creation, the Daily Mirror sold very few copies, only 25,000 (that may seem quite a large number but not measuring up to the bigger newspapers it was up against).

 These figures could be due to the women that it was aimed at being too busy with their family-orientated lifestyles. In order to save this failing Newspaper Northcliffe hired the first lady editor and chief, Mary Howarth.  Under the reign of Howarth the Mirror sold nearly 290,000 copies a day. Her new style of printing full page spreads with pictures and very little text appealed not only to the original intended audience of women, but also to the male population. One particular issue, that featured a picture of King Edward VII resting in peace on the front page, sold 2,012,000 copies, a world record I must add. This single copy alone told the newspaper that their target audience had risen therefore indicating that as long as the paper continued the printing of big, shocking events on the front page, they’d continue to sell.


Despite the success of this newspaper, Northcliffe sold the newspaper to his younger brother. Under his reign the paper did not do too well at all until Harry Guy Bartholomew became editorial director. Whilst in power at the Daily Mirror, Bartholomew drew influence from the American Daily News and brought more scandal, more sex and more violence to the Mirror.  Basil D Nicholson, the features editor at the Mirror, brought the cartoon strip to the paper. This was such a popular feature it soon became a prominent piece in most British newspapers. Along with the brilliant idea to have cartoons in the newspaper, he was also the ‘great’ mind that came up with the idea that ‘if there is no news, make some’.   

The outbreak of war slowly affected the newspapers success. Hugh Cudlipp, a member of the Daily Mirror team was recruited to the army, leaving the Mirror team down a particularly important member. To ensure the paper never failed to sell, Bartholomew made the Mirror ‘the soldier’s paper’ featuring stories about the soldiers and photos from the front line. Of course, each and EVERY story took sides with the soldiers. The newspaper continued to grow in success, however, despite his success Bartholomew was voted out of the newspaper, leaving us with the Daily Mirror we see today. 

Seminar Paper - Philosophy of the Modern World.

Chapter 3 – Freud to Derrida
            Section 1 – Freud and psychoanalysis
  • ·         In the nineteenth century, with the presence of Kant and Hegel, philosophy was at the height of interest. Each country in Europe spoke English at this time making communication with other philosophers was relatively simple. However, by the twentieth century all of this had changed. Most philosophers went their separate ways and separate countries began to establish their own ideologies. It is in this period that Bertrand Russell (the writer of our core text for year 1) became particularly dominant in academic circles in and around Britain & America. The attempt to bring together methods of philosophising throughout Europe had very little success in the second half of the century.
  • ·         Sigmund Freud was a philosopher from the 1890’s. Freud, however, never classed himself as a philosopher, he saw himself as a scientist. He took this a step further and classed himself as ‘the inventor of a new science’. Freud’s ideas and methods were so influential that all those teaching philosophy of ethics, mind or religion were forced to take into account what he had to say.
  • ·         Freud studied at a university in Vienna where he became medically trained specializing in Brain Anatomy. During his time here he spent some time working with neurologist Joseph Breuer, expanding his knowledge treating hysterical patients under hypnosis. A few years latter he then moved to Paris to further his studying under neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot. When Freud’s studying in Paris came to its conclusion he went into private medical practise.
  • ·         In 1895 together with Breuer, Freud published a book that explored the original analysis of mental illness. As his practise progressed Freud stopped using hypnosis as a method of treatment. He replaced it with a new form of treatment called psychoanalysis. This practise was described by Freud as “nothing more than an exchange of words between the patient and the doctor.” The reason for this new found method came from Freud’s realisation that the hysterical symptoms were a result of memories from a psychological trauma that the patient may have repressed. Freud says that these memories can be brought to light by a process of ‘free association’. The patient would lie on the couch and asked to say whatever came to mind. Freud convinced himself through many sessions that all traumas leading to hysterical symptoms came from infancy. He also convinced himself that they were of a sexual nature. These theories caused problems with Breuer.
  • ·         Because he lost friendship with Breuer, Freud was in practise by himself. During this time wrote one of his well known books The Interpretation of Dreams. In this book he argues that dreams are nothing but expressions of hidden sexual desires. In this instance however, Freud concluded that this was not only applicable to sufferers of hysterical symptoms, it was also applicable to normal people too. H followed up this book with The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. This book and the many others to follow simply expanded and refined Freud’s psychoanalytic theories.
  • ·         In 1923 Freud published a book that explored a whole new approach on the unconscious mind; The Ego and the Id. Freud separates psychoanalytic theory into two separate works. The first is that the big parts of our minds such as feeling and thought are unconscious. The second is that sexual impulses are not only important as the causes of mental illness, they are important as the mechanism for artistic and cultural creation. He believes that if the sexual element of a work of art or culture stays in the unconscious it is because socialization makes us think it must stay inside our heads. He goes on to say we channel these thoughts into socially acceptable activities and because we aren’t letting these thoughts surface they can rebel on us and lead to mental illness or some sort of disorder.
  • ·         Freud believed that all dreams are a message from our unconscious beings. He believed, as I have previously mentioned, that these unconscious centred on sexual development. One of Freud’s weirdest theories was that every man, from the age of infancy, is attracted to his mother and therefore resents his own father for the ‘possession’ of his mother. I use the term ‘possession’ lightly as I do not believe a woman can be ‘owned’ because they are not an object. He follows this point by stating that because of the greatness of a boy’s hostility towards his father, his father will sense this fear and punish him by castration, causing the boy to fear his father. As a result, the infant boy casts aside any feelings for his mother and becomes close with his father during the growing up process. This is what Freud called the Oedipus stage, a crucial emotional point in a young boy’s life. Freud believes that people who become fixated on these thoughts from child hood will show signs of neuroticism. Freud was adamant that there was a female equivalent, but never fully worked it out or came close to explaining it in convincing terms.
  • ·         The most famous of Freud’s theories was the three fold explanation and idea that he had complied about the unconscious. He wrote it all in a book called The Ego and the Id. He believed there were 3 main components to our unconscious; the Id, the part that is in charge of our irrational impulse thoughts, the super ego, the part that tells the Id that he can’t do all the things he wants because they are bad and the ego, the part that mediates between the two, that part that keeps harmony between the super ego and the Id. It’s when this harmony is lost that Freud believes mental illness occurs.

 It’s this theory that dominates the opinions people have of Freud today. 


Chapter 8 – Philosophy of the mind.
            Section 1. Bentham on Intention and Motive.
·         Bentham’s approach on Intention and Motive is sometimes related to that of Aquinas. In his book Principles of Morals and Legislation, he paid great attention to people’s morals and opinion, and why they say and do the things they say and do. Aquinas believed that actions made by a person are intentional if they are a ‘means to an end’. He also believed that there was a second reasoning for someone to do make an action. ‘Voluntary’ actions are actions we have to make in order to survive.
o   For example;
§  A intentional action – I’m going to eat toast this morning for my breakfast, I have to eat to survive but today I want toast.
§  A voluntary action – I’m going to get out of bed because I have to get out of bed.
·         Bentham didn’t like the use of the word voluntary because it is a misleading phrase. He said this because sometimes when an action is ‘Voluntary’ it is spontaneous, we don’t necessarily think about what we are doing, therefore making it non-intentional. Other times however other voluntary actions can be classed as uncohersed, willing to take the action.
·         Although there are a few disgressions between Bentham and Aquinas theories, they both distinguish two separate motivations for actions. Bentham took this one step further and said that each consequence is either ‘directly intentional’ or ‘obliquely intentional’.
·         Bentham used the death of King William II who died from a hunting wound caused by Sir Walter Tyrell. Bentham used his ideas on the consciousness and intention to conclude what Tyrell was thinking when the incident happened. He categorised and classified Tyrell’s thoughts in 5 different categories; unintentional, obliquely intentional, directly intentional, mediately intentional and ultimately intentional.
·         Bentham used terminology such as this to define intention itself. In order to understand why a person does the things they do, you first need to understand what that person what’s to come from the action. However, an action is only unintentional if the consequence of an action cannot be foretold or predicted. Bentham also goes on to say that a person can only be judged on how bad or good their actions are dependant on the consequence of their action.
·         Bentham establishes that although a man’s intention may be good, the motive for that said intention may be bad. This theory can also be reversed.
Section 2 – Understanding and Will
·         Kant’s ideas offer a clear distinction between understanding and reason. His studies focus upon the differences between human and animal cognitive faculties. Understanding and sensation are two traits that relate humans and animals together. Kant believes that because animals are capable of making casual relations they are therefore able to relate to sensation like humans. Animals differ from humans as they are unable to function the trait of reason. Humans can reflect on their own actions. This places humans above animals in both power and suffering. Kant says tat animal only live in the present but humans live in the past, present and the future. Reason also allows humans to obtain 3 ‘gifts’; language, freedom and science. The most important of the 3 is language as it is the most essential to everyday life.
·         Abstract knowledge is not always needed for everyday tasks. Humans do not necessarily need to understand the functioning of each task me partake in. Humans do however need to know how to make something work, not how it actually works. Both animals and humans have wills.
Section 4 – The Freudian Unconscious
·         Freud believed that everyone has a unconscious mind. He said there are 3 proofs that our unconscious mind exists; slight slips of the tongue, the recollection of dreams and neurotic symptoms. However he claims these are ‘parapraxes’, that these little slips and mistakes have a hidden motive. By understanding the beliefs of the person who has made the ‘Freudian slip' we can understand their motive for this slip.
·         DREAMS - Freud says that dreams are almost always the fantasy of a supressed wish. Good dreams that we remember are symbols of satisfaction whereas Nightmares are the exact opposite of these good dreams. Freud stated that every dream is specific to each individual dreamer, therefore making it impossible to uncode and figure out its true meaning. Only until you find out what each part on someone’s dream signifies to that individual, can you start to understand why they dreamt that way.
·         NEUROTIC SYMPTEMS – these symptoms can be revealed when you find the reason for doing something. Freud mentions a ‘friend’ that became obsessed with losing weight. Only until Freud found out that that his friend’s fiancĂ© was staying at the same resort with a ‘attractive’ male friend, did he uncover that this was the unconscious reason that his friend wanted to lose weight.
·         There are three levels of Freudian unconscious; the ID, super ego and the ego. The ID is the part of the unconscious that is controlled by the principle. The ego is the part of the unconscious that focussing on common sense and reasoning. And the super ego is the part of the unconscious that punishes the ego with feelings of guilt.
Section 5 – Philosophical Psychology in the Tractatus
·         Wittgenstein believed that a thought is a logical picture of beliefs. He identifies thoughts as propositions. In his theories there are two elements involved. There is propositional sign or sentence. There is also what is expressed from the propositional sign.